![]() ![]() These are completely different measurements. Again, 10% window, not the 250 nits peak for full field brightness you are speaking of. I'm talking about peak brightness at a 10% window, which is stated to be 400 nits. No one is talking about dimming except for you, not the media or the manufacturer. Why are you talking about dimming? This is an emissive panel, there is no dimming feature. The 400 nits quoted from Samsung is honestly disappointing. At the minimum, I'd like to have seen these QD-OLED monitors have the same or better peak brightness at 10% window than current-gen WOLED of over 700 nits. 300 nits on a desktop monitor for 10% and 25% window will not translate to a good HDR experience. I don't think anyone will dispute that 300 nits in a light controlled room would be too bright for general use of your monitor, but peak brightness does matter for HDR content. The new QD-OLED monitors are stated by Samsung to have 400 nits peak brightness for 10% window, which is pretty disappointing considering their QD-OLED TVs will hit 1,000 nits peak for 10% window. Obviously things change a lot for games as there aren't any standards there, but 1,000 nits peak for 10% window is usually a good metric to go by if you are looking for good HDR performance. HDR10 content is typically mastered for 1,000 nits peak. UWG Nick, a 21:9 Youtube channel with gameplay videos "Wide as Fcuk", Youtube channel for 21:9 info and game reviews Rule 5: No Box Pictures Related sub-reddits: Rule 4: No referral links, URL shorteners, or selling used monitors. Follow reddiquette it's a good set of basic guidelines for a more cohesive community. Rule 3: Use original sources for links, credit the OP/OC. No racism, sexism, personal insults, harassment, etc. Rule 1: All posts need to be vaguely connected to 21:9. ![]() Subreddit of the 21:9 & 32:9 aspect ratio Join us on Discord! / Ultrawide Enthusiasts
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |