![]() The common cold has been treated for decades with inhaled steam to help the mucus drain more easily. Many signs and symptoms are caused by congestion from swelling of membranes and thickened mucus inside the nose. ![]() Symptoms include fever, loss of appetite, feeling unwell, feeling chilled, with headache, muscle aches, and pains. The diagnosis is based on symptoms, and the treatments are mainly symptomatic. It does not usually cause complications, but can lead to days off work or school due to discomfort caused by symptoms. We examined the effects of inhaling heated, humidified air delivered by a device (RhinoTherm) for people with common cold.Ĭommon cold is the most common infection in humans. Heated, humidified air for the common cold Some studies reported minor adverse events (including discomfort or irritation of the nose). There was significant heterogeneity in the effects of heated, humidified air on different outcomes, therefore we graded the quality of the evidence as low. ![]() therapy did not help), the number of participants reporting resolution of symptoms was not significantly higher in the heated humidified group (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.18 2 studies, 124 participants). As judged by the subjective response to therapy (i.e. One study examined viral shedding in nasal washings, finding no significant difference between treatment and placebo groups (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.19). One study conducted in the USA demonstrated worsened nasal resistance, but an earlier Israeli study showed improvement. No studies demonstrated an exacerbation of clinical symptom scores. There is an argument for using either form of analysis. It was uncertain whether heated, humidified air provides symptomatic relief for the common cold, as the fixed‐effect analysis showed evidence of an effect (odds ratio (OR) 0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.56 2 studies, 149 participants), but the random‐effects analysis showed no significant difference in the results (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.95). The 'Risk of bias' assessment suggested an unclear risk of bias in the domain of randomisation and a low risk of bias in performance, detection, attrition, and reporting. We included no new studies in this 2017 update. We included six trials from five publications involving a total of 387 participants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |